The Department of Justice (DOJ) and 30 state attorneys general have filed an antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation, seeking to separate the company from its Ticketmaster subsidiary. The 124-page complaint alleges multiple violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act and state competition laws.

Key Allegations:

• Live Nation and Ticketmaster abuse their joint ownership to eliminate competition
• The companies retaliate against venues that work with competitors
• They restrict artists' venue access and block venues from using multiple ticket providers
• The merger has led to reduced innovation and higher prices for consumers

The lawsuit specifically highlights Live Nation's relationship with Oak View Group, alleging they established a "competitive détente" where Oak View Group avoided concert promotions while Live Nation stepped back from arena consulting.

Live Nation's Defense:

Live Nation strongly disputes these claims, arguing that:

• The merger was previously approved by the Obama administration in 2010
• Their profit margins are lower than major tech companies
• The lawsuit stems from populist anti-business sentiment rather than genuine antitrust concerns
• Current market conditions, not their practices, are responsible for higher ticket prices

The company's stock dropped approximately 8% following the announcement. Live Nation has launched a dedicated webpage addressing the lawsuit's claims and maintains that breaking up the company would not be legally permissible.

Industry Response:

The Coalition for Ticket Fairness supports the DOJ's action, emphasizing the need for federal legislation to address monopolistic practices in the ticket market. They warn that Live Nation's recent state-level lobbying efforts, while marketed as "fan-friendly," may actually harm consumer interests.

Related Articles

Previous Articles