Diddy Files $100M Lawsuit Against NBCUniversal Over 'Malicious' Documentary Claims

Diddy Files $100M Lawsuit Against NBCUniversal Over 'Malicious' Documentary Claims

By Marcus Bennett

March 11, 2025 at 10:47 AM

Sean "Diddy" Combs has filed a $100 million defamation lawsuit against NBCUniversal and Peacock over their documentary "Making of a Bad Boy," claiming it contains false and malicious content.

Diddy speaking at NBC Universal event

Diddy speaking at NBC Universal event

The lawsuit, filed in New York state court, alleges the documentary presents "outrageous lies and conspiracy theories" about Combs, including unfounded accusations of serial murder and sex trafficking. His legal team argues that NBCUniversal deliberately ignored truth in favor of sensationalism.

Sean Diddy federal indictment photo

Sean Diddy federal indictment photo

The 90-minute documentary features interviews with former associates and alleged victims, examining various allegations of violence and abuse throughout Diddy's career. It also explores the deaths of Notorious B.I.G. and Kim Porter. Combs' attorneys claim the documentary maliciously portrays him as a "monster" without proper evidence.

Led by attorney Erica Wolff, Combs' legal team argues that NBCUniversal prioritized profits over journalistic integrity. While Combs hasn't sought to block the documentary's airing, he demands accountability for what he claims are false allegations.

Diddy in federal indictment photo

Diddy in federal indictment photo

Combs is currently facing multiple legal challenges, including civil and criminal cases involving sexual misconduct and racketeering charges. He is being held at Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center and faces trial in May 2025, with potential life imprisonment if convicted.

The lawsuit's outcome could significantly impact how streaming platforms handle biographical content and their responsibility for fact-checking. NBCUniversal has not yet responded to the lawsuit but is expected to defend their documentary under First Amendment protections.

This case may set a precedent for future celebrity defamation lawsuits and could influence how media companies approach controversial content about public figures.

Related Articles

Previous Articles